> Am 25.10.2016 um 18:51 schrieb Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>: > > On 10/25/2016 07:48 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi >> index b04adee..91456b4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-board-common.dtsi >> @@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ >> compatible = "ti,abe-twl6040"; >> ti,model = "omap5-uevm"; >> >> + ti,jack_detection; > > ti,jack-detection Hm. Looks as if we have found another bug: which one is correct? https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/omap-abe-twl6040.txt#n15 https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/sound/soc/omap/omap-abe-twl6040.c#n289 Should I add another patch? > >> ti,mclk-freq = <19200000>; >> >> ti,mcpdm = <&mcpdm>; >> > > > -- > Péter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
