On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 03:50:18PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > You acked it, that's saying that you're OK with the patch and are > > > expecting someone else to apply it. > > > No it doesn't, you made that up. :) > > > I know when you and some others Ack a patch, that's what you mean, but > > That's the standard meaning I'm afraid, you're going to confuse people > if you do that. I'd suggest using a different tag if you want to do > this, probably make one up. Reviewed-by-BUT-DONT-TAKE-IT-YOU-FIEND: <me> :) Temporary-Acked-by-[to go through MFD tree]: <me> Suggestions? > > you've been working with me for long enough to know that's not what I > > mean when I Ack a patch. I do it as an indication that I've reviewed > > the patch and I'm happy with it. Most MFD patches that have > > Sorry but I'm not actually reading most of these threads, I've not seen > this behaviour. Mostly I just look at the relevant patches, especially > on the resends where presumably this has been happening. Not sure why I > even saw the ack here, perhaps I had some question about the versioning > API. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
