On 30.08.2016 11:03, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Marcin Niestroj wrote:
ping
Don't do that!
If you think the patch hasn't attracted attention in >2 weeks, then
it's probably slipped through the gaps and you need to send a
[RESEND].
Clear.
However ...
On 20.06.2016 12:50, Marcin Niestroj wrote:
Add tps65217 power buttor subdevice with assigned IRQ resources.
Signed-off-by: Marcin Niestroj <m.niestroj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
This patch has a maintainer Ack, so why are you pinging?
Because I didn't see it applied anywhere and there were no new
comments, so I thought it slipped somewhere.
So my question is: what happens with the patch after maintainer Ack?
Are we still waiting for some comments from the community? Do I still
need to worry, that the patch might slipped? What is author's role now?
---
Depends on patch 1 in series
Changes v1 -> v4: none
drivers/mfd/tps65217.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c
index 41b5d59..57c8741 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65217.c
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ static struct resource charger_resources[] = {
DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65217_IRQ_USB, "USB"),
};
+static struct resource pb_resources[] = {
+ DEFINE_RES_IRQ_NAMED(TPS65217_IRQ_PB, "PB"),
+};
+
struct tps65217_irq {
int mask;
int interrupt;
@@ -122,6 +126,12 @@ static struct mfd_cell tps65217s[] = {
.resources = charger_resources,
.of_compatible = "ti,tps65217-charger",
},
+ {
+ .name = "tps65217-pwrbutton",
+ .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(pb_resources),
+ .resources = pb_resources,
+ .of_compatible = "ti,tps65217-pwrbutton",
+ },
};
static irqreturn_t tps65217_irq_thread(int irq, void *data)
--
Marcin Niestroj
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
