On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:33:50PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 09:26:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > Hello, Ingo, > > > > > > This series changes a number of event tracepoints to their _rcuidle() form > > > to allow use from idle without lockdep-RCU complaints, a straightforward > > > modification that has been successfully applied many times. These splats > > > were found in testing by Guenter Roeck and Tony Lindgren, who have > > > both successfully tested the full series. Tony asked that I carry these > > > in -rcu: > > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160426213630.GV5995@xxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > These have been posted to LKML, CCing relevant maintainers, who have > > > not objected to the proposed changes: > > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160516184844.GA20144@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > These maintainers are also CCed on this pull request. > > > > > > They have also been subjected to 0day Test Robot and -next testing. > > > > And this time actually including the pull request... :-/ > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > These changes are available in the git repository at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git for-mingo > > > > for you to fetch changes up to e7c38dda94b23965a3eb46ef4656bb8cb921933d: > > > > arm: Use _rcuidle suffix to allow clk_core_enable() to used from idle (2016-05-18 11:55:29 -0700) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Paul E. McKenney (6): > > arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle > > arm: Use _rcuidle for suspend/resume tracepoints > > arm: Add _rcuidle tracepoints to allow clk_core_disable() use from idle > > arm: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_idle() use from idle > > arm: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_resume() to be called from idle > > arm: Use _rcuidle suffix to allow clk_core_enable() to used from idle > > > > arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 9 +++++---- > > drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 14 +++++++------- > > drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 ++++---- > > 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > Just wondering, wouldn't it be better for Russell to pull/apply, as it appears to > be a mostly ARM patch-set? Fair enough -- I can always repost the patches to their respective maintainers if you are in any way uncomfortable taking them. The patches do not depend on each other. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
