On 11/05/16 18:28, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Rob, Mark, >> >> On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote: >>> A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform >>> drivers for all interrupt controllers. >> >> Yes, that is fine with me, but can we decide on whether the platform >> driver should match "tegra210-agic" or the early driver should bail-out >> if clocks/power-domains are present? >> >> I am fine with either, but I think that Rob prefers the tegra210-agic >> compat string and Mark prefers to bail-out of the early driver if >> clocks/power-domains are present. > > If anything, I wasn't too keen on bailing out becuase of those > properties, as I mentioned for the case of a root interrupt controller. > > I am happy to match the "tegra210-agic" string specifically. Thanks guys. I will stick with tegra210-agic for now. Cheers Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
