Rob,
On 04/28/2016 04:07 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:36:42PM -0500, Franklin S Cooper Jr wrote:
>> There are several SOC specific compatibles for ECAP, EHRPWM and PWMMS
>> that are in use but aren't properly documented. Therefore, fix this
>> by adding the compatibles to the appropriate binding documents.
>>
>> While at it make minor corrections to the binding document.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@xxxxxx>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt | 12 ++++++++++--
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt | 12 ++++++++++--
>> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tipwmss.txt | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
>> index fb81179..788da6c 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiecap.txt
>> @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ TI SOC ECAP based APWM controller
>>
>> Required properties:
>> - compatible: Must be "ti,<soc>-ecap".
>> - for am33xx - compatible = "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> - for da850 - compatible = "ti,da850-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> + for am33xx - compatible = "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> + for am4372 - compatible = "ti,am4372-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> + for da850 - compatible = "ti,da850-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> - #pwm-cells: should be 3. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
>> the cells format. The PWM channel index ranges from 0 to 4. The only third
>> cell flag supported by this binding is PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
>> @@ -22,6 +23,13 @@ ecap0: ecap@0 { /* ECAP on am33xx */
>> ti,hwmods = "ecap0";
>> };
>>
>> +ecap0: ecap@0 { /* ECAP on am4372 */
>
> The unit address is wrong.
>
>> + compatible = "ti,am4372-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> + #pwm-cells = <3>;
>> + reg = <0x48300100 0x80>;
>> + ti,hwmods = "ecap0";
>> +};
>> +
>> ecap0: ecap@0 { /* ECAP on da850 */
>> compatible = "ti,da850-ecap", "ti,am33xx-ecap";
>> #pwm-cells = <3>;
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
>> index 9c100b2..99b544f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.txt
>> @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ TI SOC EHRPWM based PWM controller
>>
>> Required properties:
>> - compatible: Must be "ti,<soc>-ehrpwm".
>> - for am33xx - compatible = "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
>> - for da850 - compatible = "ti,da850-ehrpwm", "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
>> + for am33xx - compatible = "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
>> + for am4372 - compatible = "ti,am4372-ehrpwm", "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
>> + for da850 - compatible = "ti,da850-ehrpwm", "ti,am33xx-ehrpwm";
>> - #pwm-cells: should be 3. See pwm.txt in this directory for a description of
>> the cells format. The only third cell flag supported by this binding is
>> PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED.
>> @@ -22,6 +23,13 @@ ehrpwm0: ehrpwm@0 { /* EHRPWM on am33xx */
>> ti,hwmods = "ehrpwm0";
>> };
>>
>> +ehrpwm0: ehrpwm@0 { /* EHRPWM on am4372 */
>
> ditto
>
> Otherwise,
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
Yes, the unit address is wrong but it is wrong in several places. I
added it like that to match what the other bindings are doing. However,
patches 3 and 4 fixes these unit address problems for all the bindings
all together to make things clear.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
