Hi Kishon, On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 26 April 2016 11:36 AM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> Hi Kishon, >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Adding vendor specific directories in phy to group >>> phy drivers under their respective vendor umbrella. >>> >>> Also updated the MAINTAINERS file to reflect the correct >>> directory structure for phy drivers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> >>> Changes from v1: >>> - Updated the MAINTAINERS file to reflect the same change >>> in directory structure. >>> - Removed PHY_PLAT config as pointed out by Kishon. >>> So we don't require the second patch in the v1 of this series: >>> [PATCH 2/2] arm: mach-spear: Enable PHY_PLAT to meet dependency >>> - Renamed sunxi --> allwinner; rcar --> renesas. >>> - Fixed error coming with qcom Makefile. >> >> Does this change looks okay now ? >> I think you must be planning to take this in after 4.7 rc1 is out, isn't it ? > > I'm not sure. I'm thinking which should be the right way to group the phy > drivers, by vendors or by type (usb, pcie, etc..). I'm more inclined to group > it by type. I guess there are atleast couple of phy drivers (PIPE and ST's MiPHY) that have multiple roles - USB or PCIe or SATA. So grouping such drivers in one of the phy-types will be tricky, WDUT > > Thanks > Kishon -- Best Regards Vivek Gautam Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore India -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
