On 04/19/2016 08:14 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 18:44:41 +0300 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:On 04/19/2016 06:01 PM, David Rivshin (Allworx) wrote:On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 17:41:07 +0300 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:Hi, On 04/19/2016 04:56 PM, Andrew Goodbody wrote:Adding a 2nd PHY to cpsw results in a NULL pointer dereference as below. Fix by maintaining a reference to each PHY node in slave struct instead of a single reference in the priv struct which was overwritten by the 2nd PHY.David, Is it possible to drop prev version of this patch from linux-next - it breaks boot on many TI boards with -next.[ 17.870933] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000180 [ 17.879557] pgd = dc8bc000 [ 17.882514] [00000180] *pgd=9c882831, *pte=00000000, *ppte=00000000 [ 17.889213] Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] ARM [ 17.893838] Modules linked in: [ 17.897102] CPU: 0 PID: 1657 Comm: connmand Not tainted 4.5.0-ge463dfb-dirty #11 [ 17.904947] Hardware name: Cambrionix whippet [ 17.909576] task: dc859240 ti: dc968000 task.ti: dc968000 [ 17.915339] PC is at phy_attached_print+0x18/0x8c [ 17.920339] LR is at phy_attached_info+0x14/0x18 [ 17.925247] pc : [<c042baec>] lr : [<c042bb74>] psr: 600f0113 [ 17.925247] sp : dc969cf8 ip : dc969d28 fp : dc969d18 [ 17.937425] r10: dda7a400 r9 : 00000000 r8 : 00000000 [ 17.942971] r7 : 00000001 r6 : ddb00480 r5 : ddb8cb34 r4 : 00000000 [ 17.949898] r3 : c0954cc0 r2 : c09562b0 r1 : 00000000 r0 : 00000000 [ 17.956829] Flags: nZCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment none [ 17.964401] Control: 10c5387d Table: 9c8bc019 DAC: 00000051 [ 17.970500] Process connmand (pid: 1657, stack limit = 0xdc968210) [ 17.977059] Stack: (0xdc969cf8 to 0xdc96a000)[...][ 18.323956] [<c05e4cb8>] (inet_ioctl) from [<c055f5ac>] (sock_ioctl+0x15c/0x2d8) [ 18.331829] [<c055f450>] (sock_ioctl) from [<c010b388>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x98/0x8d0) [ 18.339765] r7:00008914 r6:dc8ab4c0 r5:dd257ae0 r4:beaeda20 [ 18.345822] [<c010b2f0>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<c010bc34>] (SyS_ioctl+0x74/0x84) [ 18.353573] r10:00000000 r9:00000011 r8:beaeda20 r7:00008914 r6:dc8ab4c0 r5:dc8ab4c0 [ 18.361924] r4:00000000 [ 18.364653] [<c010bbc0>] (SyS_ioctl) from [<c00163e0>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c) [ 18.372682] r9:dc968000 r8:c00165e8 r7:00000036 r6:00000002 r5:00000011 r4:00000000 [ 18.380960] Code: e92dd810 e24cb010 e24dd010 e59b4004 (e5902180) [ 18.387580] ---[ end trace c80529466223f3f3 ]---^ Could you make it shorter and drop timestamps, pls?Signed-off-by: Andrew Goodbody <andrew.goodbody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- v2 - Move allocation of memory for priv->slaves to inside cpsw_probe_dt so it has data->slaves initialised first which is needed to calculate size drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 30 +++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 42fdfd4..e62909c 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ struct cpsw_slave { struct cpsw_slave_data *data; struct phy_device *phy; struct net_device *ndev; + struct device_node *phy_node; u32 port_vlan; u32 open_stat; }; @@ -367,7 +368,6 @@ struct cpsw_priv { spinlock_t lock; struct platform_device *pdev; struct net_device *ndev; - struct device_node *phy_node; struct napi_struct napi_rx; struct napi_struct napi_tx; struct device *dev; @@ -1148,8 +1148,8 @@ static void cpsw_slave_open(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv) cpsw_ale_add_mcast(priv->ale, priv->ndev->broadcast, 1 << slave_port, 0, 0, ALE_MCAST_FWD_2); - if (priv->phy_node) - slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, priv->phy_node, + if (slave->phy_node) + slave->phy = of_phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->phy_node, &cpsw_adjust_link, 0, slave->data->phy_if); else slave->phy = phy_connect(priv->ndev, slave->data->phy_id, @@ -1946,7 +1946,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_priv *priv, struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node; struct device_node *slave_node; struct cpsw_platform_data *data = &priv->data; - int i = 0, ret; + int i, ret; u32 prop; if (!node) @@ -1958,6 +1958,14 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_priv *priv, } data->slaves = prop; + priv->slaves = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, + sizeof(struct cpsw_slave) * data->slaves, + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!priv->slaves) + return -ENOMEM; + for (i = 0; i < data->slaves; i++) + priv->slaves[i].slave_num = i; + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "active_slave", &prop)) { dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Missing active_slave property in the DT.\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -2023,6 +2031,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_priv *priv, if (ret) dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Doesn't have any child node\n"); + i = 0; for_each_child_of_node(node, slave_node) { struct cpsw_slave_data *slave_data = data->slave_data + i; const void *mac_addr = NULL; @@ -2033,7 +2042,8 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dt(struct cpsw_priv *priv, if (strcmp(slave_node->name, "slave")) continue; - priv->phy_node = of_parse_phandle(slave_node, "phy-handle", 0); + priv->slaves[i].phy_node = + of_parse_phandle(slave_node, "phy-handle", 0);i++? Ideally, the simplest way is to save phy_node in slave_data, but ... (see comment below).FYI, I have a patch [1] that does exactly that in my queue. Sorry I've been busy and haven't had a chance to rebase/retest/resubmit since Nicolas gave his Tested-By (and I missed Andrew's original patch). I can probably steal some time to resurrect that quickly if it's preferred, just let me know. [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg357772.htmlAh Ok. There are no user of cpsw_platform_data outside of net/ethernet/ti/, so yes, looks like your patch 1 does exactly what's needed.Given that the v1 of Andrew's patch is already in Dave's net tree, and would obviously have many conflicts with mine, how should I proceed? Since you already requested Dave revert that patch, should I just wait for that to happen and then resubmit my series? Dave, Does that sound good to you?
May be you can send revert + your patch 1 (only fix for this issue). Dave, Does that sound good to you? -- regards, -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
