Hi Paul,
On 04/10/2016 01:42 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi Suman
>
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> The omap_hwmod _enable() function can return success without setting
>> the hwmod state to _HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED for IPs with reset lines when
>> all of the reset lines are asserted. The omap_hwmod _idle() function
>> also performs a similar check, but after checking for the hwmod state
>> first. This triggers the WARN when pm_runtime_get and pm_runtime_put
>> are invoked on IPs with all reset lines asserted. Reverse the checks
>> for hwmod state and reset lines status to fix this.
>>
>> Issue found during a unbind operation on a device with reset lines
>> still asserted, example backtrace below
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 879 at arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c:2207 _idle+0x1e4/0x240()
>> omap_hwmod: mmu_dsp: idle state can only be entered from enabled state
>> Modules linked in:
>> CPU: 1 PID: 879 Comm: sh Not tainted 4.4.0-00008-ga989d951331a #3
>> Hardware name: Generic OMAP5 (Flattened Device Tree)
>> [<c0018e60>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c0014dc4>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
>> [<c0014dc4>] (show_stack) from [<c037ac28>] (dump_stack+0x90/0xc0)
>> [<c037ac28>] (dump_stack) from [<c003f420>] (warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb4)
>> [<c003f420>] (warn_slowpath_common) from [<c003f48c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x30/0x40)
>> [<c003f48c>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c0028c20>] (_idle+0x1e4/0x240)
>> [<c0028c20>] (_idle) from [<c0029080>] (omap_hwmod_idle+0x28/0x48)
>> [<c0029080>] (omap_hwmod_idle) from [<c002a5a4>] (omap_device_idle+0x3c/0x90)
>> [<c002a5a4>] (omap_device_idle) from [<c0427a90>] (__rpm_callback+0x2c/0x60)
>> [<c0427a90>] (__rpm_callback) from [<c0427ae4>] (rpm_callback+0x20/0x80)
>> [<c0427ae4>] (rpm_callback) from [<c0427f84>] (rpm_suspend+0x138/0x74c)
>> [<c0427f84>] (rpm_suspend) from [<c0428b78>] (__pm_runtime_idle+0x78/0xa8)
>> [<c0428b78>] (__pm_runtime_idle) from [<c041f514>] (__device_release_driver+0x64/0x100)
>> [<c041f514>] (__device_release_driver) from [<c041f5d0>] (device_release_driver+0x20/0x2c)
>> [<c041f5d0>] (device_release_driver) from [<c041d85c>] (unbind_store+0x78/0xf8)
>> [<c041d85c>] (unbind_store) from [<c0206df8>] (kernfs_fop_write+0xc0/0x1c4)
>> [<c0206df8>] (kernfs_fop_write) from [<c018a120>] (__vfs_write+0x20/0xdc)
>> [<c018a120>] (__vfs_write) from [<c018a9cc>] (vfs_write+0x90/0x164)
>> [<c018a9cc>] (vfs_write) from [<c018b1f0>] (SyS_write+0x44/0x9c)
>> [<c018b1f0>] (SyS_write) from [<c0010420>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c)
>> ---[ end trace a4182013c75a9f50 ]---
>>
>> While at this, fix the sequence in _shutdown() as well, though there
>> is no easy reproducible scenario.
>>
>> Fixes: 747834ab8347 ("ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: revise hardreset behavior")
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx>
>
> Thanks, I'm going to queue this for v4.7, mostly to get in more testing
> and integration time. Let me know if you think it's important enough to
> go into v4.6-rc.
Nope, not essential for the -rc cycle. I am fine with it getting queued
for v4.7.
>
>
>> There are couple of pr_debug statements that only print once the code
>> flow passes through certain conditions. Not sure if you wanted them
>> to be printed first thing when entering the functions or only if the
>> function is really doing something. But it is still not consistent
>> between _enable(), _idle() and _shutdown().
>
> Yeah those need to be cleaned up. Seems like the best thing to do
> is to move them all to the beginning of their respective functions.
You want that fixed in this patch or a separate patch?
regards
Suman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
