On Tuesday 15 December 2015 14:45:59 Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > This series is basically to deprecate using phy-omap-control and use > syscon APIs to program the control module registers. > > Changes from v2: > No changes. > > Changes from v1: > *) cleanup ti_pipe3_probe in multiple steps > *) other minor cleanups > > Changes from [1] in PHY patches include > *) cleanup ti_pipe3_probe > *) have mask, power_on and power_off values in usb_phy_data for > omap-usb2 phy > > The patches have been pushed to > git://git.ti.com/linux-phy/linux-phy.git syscon > > [1] -> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/23/189 > > All the testing was done both before applying the dt patches and after > applying the dt patches (dt patches will be posted shortly). > Can you explain here what the conversion is good for? Why do you prefer the syscon mapping over a high-level driver in this case? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html