On Monday 30 November 2015 15:45:33 Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> const char *name);
> struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev, const char *name);
> +
> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name);
> +struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan_by_mask(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask);
> +
> void dma_release_channel(struct dma_chan *chan);
> int dma_get_slave_caps(struct dma_chan *chan, struct dma_slave_caps *caps);
> #else
> @@ -1268,6 +1291,14 @@ static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_slave_channel(struct device *dev,
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> +static inline struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +}
>
The prototypes for dma_request_chan() don't match, otherwise looks good.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
