On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote: > > Adding devicetree list. > > > > Thread starts at > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html > > > > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [151105 03:41]: > > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Rohár wrote: > > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [151012 13:29]: > > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments > > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree > > >>>>>> what needs to be done. > > > > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series. > > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport > > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object). > > Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone? > > I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would > be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something. > Pavel Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new? I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and discarded. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
