Hi,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> writes:
> On 11/13/2015 07:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> writes:
>>> On 11/13/2015 06:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> writes:
>>>>> Now the System stall is observed on TI AM437x based board
>>>>> (am437x-gp-evm) during resuming from System suspend when ARM Global
>>>>> timer is selected as clocksource device - SysRq are working, but
>>>>> nothing else. The reason of stall is that ARM Global timer loses its
>>>>> contexts.
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason of stall is that ARM Global timer loses its contexts during
>>>>> System suspend:
>>>>> GT_CONTROL.TIMER_ENABLE = 0 (unbanked)
>>>>> GT_COUNTERx = 0
>>>>>
>>>>> Hence, update ARM Global timer driver to reflect above behaviour
>>>>> - save GT_CONTROL.TIMER_ENABLE during suspend and restore on resume;
>>>>> - ensure clocksource and clockevent devices have coresponding flags
>>>>> (CLOCK_SOURCE_SUSPEND_NONSTOP and CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP) set
>>>>> depending on presence of "always-on" DT property.
>>>>>
>>>>> CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>>>>> index a2cb6fa..1bbaf64 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_global_timer.c
>>>>> @@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ static void __iomem *gt_base;
>>>>> static unsigned long gt_clk_rate;
>>>>> static int gt_ppi;
>>>>> static struct clock_event_device __percpu *gt_evt;
>>>>> +static bool gt_always_on;
>>>>> +static u32 gt_control;
>>>>>
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * To get the value from the Global Timer Counter register proceed as follows:
>>>>> @@ -168,6 +170,9 @@ static int gt_clockevents_init(struct clock_event_device *clk)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (!gt_always_on)
>>>>> + clk->features |= CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP;
>>>>> +
>>>>> clk->name = "arm_global_timer";
>>>>> clk->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT |
>>>>> CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERCPU;
>>>>> @@ -195,12 +200,25 @@ static cycle_t gt_clocksource_read(struct clocksource *cs)
>>>>> return gt_counter_read();
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static void gt_suspend(struct clocksource *cs)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + gt_control = readl(gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>> +static void gt_resume(struct clocksource *cs)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + /* enables timer on all the cores */
>>>>> + writel(gt_control & GT_CONTROL_TIMER_ENABLE, gt_base + GT_CONTROL);
>>>>
>>>> do you really need to save context if all you restore is TIMER_ENABLE
>>>> bit ? seems like you could skip gt_suspend altogether. Is there really a
>>>> situation where this driver is running and GT isn't enabled ?
>>>
>>> Now It's not. It's always enabled. I did it because .suspend() is called for
>>> all registered clock sources regardless of their usage. So, potentially
>>> in the future, at the moment when .suspend() is called it might be disabled
>>> (for example, .enable/disable() callbacks can be added and, if ARM Global timer
>>> will not be registered as sched_clock, it will be possible to keep it disabled
>>> if not used now).
>>>
>>> But It's not essentially now - I can update it and drop save restore.
>>> Pls, confirm.
>>
>> I think it's best to skip suspend completely. You're not restoring
>> anything you saved during suspend, unless you meant | where you used &.
>>
>
> I didn't get it - I'm restoring one bit(0) only.
that's the point, if you know you're restoring only that bit. Why save
anything at all ?
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
