Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP: Change all cpu_is_* occurences to soc_is_*

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Monday 12 October 2015 10:59 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [151012 10:17]:
* Keerthy <a0393675@xxxxxx> [150901 17:24]:


On Tuesday 01 September 2015 11:33 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Keerthy <a0393675@xxxxxx> [150901 10:22]:


On Wednesday 26 August 2015 09:29 AM, Keerthy wrote:
Currently apart from dra7, omap5 and amx3 all the other SoCs
are identified using cpu_is_* functions which is not right since
they are all SoCs(System on Chips). Hence changing the SoC
identification code to use soc_is instead of cpu_is and keeping
defines for cpu_is where needed. This allows us to replace the
rest of cpu_is usage along with other fixes as needed.

Tony,

A Gentle ping on this.

Looks good to me for v4.4. I'll apply it after some testing
after -rc1.

Thanks Tony.

Now with the fixes finally out of the way, applying into
omap-for-v4.4/cleanup.

Uhh actually not applying. This breaks builds quite a bit depending on
the .config options chosen:

arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:257:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap243x’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:259:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap44xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
...
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:389:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap34xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
...
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:389:7: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap34xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
...
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:257:15: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap243x’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c:259:8: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap44xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
...
arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:767:6: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_is_omap24xx’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Keerthy, can you please test this with just single SoC configurations
and run randconfig builds on this overnight.

I will do that Tony. I tested omap2plus_defconfig and boot tested on multiple platforms.


And then we obviously need to test to make sure that this does not
break booting on various platforms for multi SoC and single SoC
configurations.

Okay.


And then you can repost, please include what all was tested.

Sure.


Thanks,

Tony

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux