* Marc Titinger <mtitinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [150925 08:02]:
>
>
> On 25/09/2015 16:10, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 15:22:25 +0200
> >Marc Titinger <mtitinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>From: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>power_domain_target arg3 is now a string (event name) with generic power
> >>domains. In the case of Omap, it is a hint to the prev/next switch op.
> >>Incidentally this trace is now conditioned by CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG.
> >I'm curious to why the addition of this config option?
> >
> I meant to be consistent with Juno/generic-power-domains, so that this trace
> always (or never) requires this switch.
> I think I will remove this condition for both actually.
>
> >>Compiled for Omap2+ but not tested.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Marc Titinger <mtitinger@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> >>index 78af6d8..cd77696 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c
> >>@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void _update_logic_membank_counters(struct powerdomain *pwrdm)
> >> static int _pwrdm_state_switch(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, int flag)
> >> {
> >>- int prev, next, state, trace_state = 0;
> >>+ int prev, state;
> >> if (pwrdm == NULL)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >>@@ -177,18 +177,25 @@ static int _pwrdm_state_switch(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, int flag)
> >> pwrdm->state_counter[prev]++;
> >> if (prev == PWRDM_POWER_RET)
> >> _update_logic_membank_counters(pwrdm);
> >>- /*
> >>- * If the power domain did not hit the desired state,
> >>- * generate a trace event with both the desired and hit states
> >>- */
> >>- next = pwrdm_read_next_pwrst(pwrdm);
> >>- if (next != prev) {
> >>- trace_state = (PWRDM_TRACE_STATES_FLAG |
> >>+
> >>+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_ADVANCED_DEBUG
> >You do realize that you can add this to the block:
> >
> >
> > if (trace_power_domain_target_enabled()) {
> Nope I didn't, but now I do ;) thanks.
Probably best to keep this with your series, it should not cause merge conflicts,
so:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
