On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:01:13PM +0200, Bastian Stender wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bastian Stender <bst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > index 949696b..a3a0cd1 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap4-common.c > @@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ static int __init omap4_sram_init(void) > struct device_node *np; > struct gen_pool *sram_pool; > > + /* AM335x is OMAP2+, so no erratum I688 handling needed > + * (see CONFIG_OMAP4_ERRATA_I688) needed This makes no sense. OMAP4 is OMAP2+ as well, but it needs the erratum. In fact, all code in mach-omap2 is "OMAP2+". So, AM335x being "OMAP2+" is no reason at all why I688 should be disabled. Please fix this comment. Please also put something in the commit message which explains fully why you are making this change. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
