On 08/05/2015 10:51 AM, Michal Suchanek wrote: > Hello, > > On 4 August 2015 at 19:59, R, Vignesh <vigneshr@xxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> On 8/4/2015 9:21 PM, Mark Brown wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 03, 2015 at 10:27:19AM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: >>> >>>> @use_mmap_mode: Some SPI controller chips are optimized for interacting >>>> with serial flash memories. These chips have memory mapped interface, >>>> through which entire serial flash memory slave can be read/written as if >>>> though they are physical memories (like RAM). Using this interface, >>>> flash can be accessed using memcpy() function and the spi controller >>>> hardware will take care of communicating with serial flash over SPI. >>>> Setting this flag will indicate the SPI controller driver that the >>>> spi_message is from mtd layer to read from/write to flash. The SPI >>>> master driver can then appropriately switch the controller to memory >>>> mapped interface to read from/write to flash, based on this flag (See >>>> drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c for example). >>>> NOTE: If the SPI controller chip lacks memory mapped interface, then the >>>> driver will ignore this flag and use normal SPI protocol to read >>>> from/write to flash. Communication with non-flash SPI devices is not >>>> possible using the memory mapped interface. >>> >>> I still can't tell from the above what this interface is supposed to do. >>> It sounds like the use of memory mapped mode is supposed to be >>> transparent to users, it should just affect how the controller interacts >>> with the hardware, but if that's the case why do we need to expose it to >>> users at all? Shouldn't the driver just use memory mapped mode if it's >>> faster? >>> >> >> TI QSPI controller has two blocks: >> 1. SPI_CORE: This is generic(normal) spi mode. This can be used to >> communicate with any SPI devices (serial flashes as well as non-flash >> devices like touchscreen). >> 2. SFI_MM_IF(SPI memory mapped interface): The SFI_MM_IF block only >> allows reading and writing to an SPI flash device only. Used to speed up >> flash reads. It _cannot_ be used to communicate with non flash devices. >> Now, the spi_message that ti-qspi receives in transfer_one() callback >> can be from mtd device(in which case SFI_MM_IF can be used) or from any >> other non flash SPI device (in which case SFI_MM_IF must not be used >> instead SPI_CORE is to be used) but there is no way(is there?) to >> distinguish where spi_message is from. Therefore I introduced flag >> (use_mmap_mode) to struct spi_message. mtd driver will set flag to true, >> this helps the ti-qspi driver to determine that the user is flash device >> and thus can do read via SFI_MM_IF. If this flag is not set then the >> user is assumed to be non flash SPI driver and will use SPI_CORE block >> to communicate. >> >> On the whole, I just need a way to determine that the user is a flash >> device in order to switch to memory mapped interface. >> > > Maybe it can be set on the SPI slave rather than each message. You mean to add flag to spi_device struct? That's ok for me. -- Regards Vignesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
