On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 06 July 2015 14:31:27 Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> [150706 05:25]: >> > into which file should I put documentation about new DT properties? >> >> If it's Linux generic like linux,revision, then how about >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/revision.txt? >> >> For the ATAGs, Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atag.txt? >> >> Regards, >> >> Tony > > Hm... now I'm thinking into which DT field should I put atags and > revision. In previous emails you wrote to use "linux,atags", now > "arm,atags"? And put them into root node? Or other? > > In arch/arm/boot/compressed/atags_to_fdt.c code I see that most atag > properties are converted into "/chosen" node in DT... > > So what do you prefer for "revision" and what for "atags"? > > Some mentioned examples: > > "/revision" This one. This is a top level h/w property. > "/chosen/revision" > "/linux,revision" > "/chosen/linux,revision" > ... > > "/atags" > "/chosen/atags" > "/linux,atags" > "/chosen/linux,atags" This one. ATAGs are a Linux data struct. Rob > "/arm,atags" > "/chosen/arm,atags" > ... > > -- > Pali Rohár > pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
