On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 04:43:34PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > Buggy consumers could notice different bug symptoms. The main > example would be refcounting bugs; also, any (out-of-tree) users > of the experimental regulator_set_optimum_mode() stuff which > don't call it when they're done using a regulator. I'm OK with this from a code point of view so Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> However any consumers that take advantage of this won't be able to safely share a regulator without extra work since they have no way of telling why a regulator is in the state that it's in without extra stuff. We should probably have something along the lines of a regulator_get_exclusive() for them. Previously the consumer counting would have stopped them interfering with enables done by other consumers. There will be other consumers that can't safely share a regulator anyway (eg, requiring additional code to notice and handle voltage changes) so it'd be a good thing to have. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
