* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [150603 13:36]: > > AM43xx, even though it's a single processor A9, it still has TWD and global > timer. I was doing some profiling with RT v4.0 and latency is 3.5x lower just > by switching from gptimer to twd/global. > > The only problem is that currently, is_smp() check prevents me from using twd > with AM43xx (that's why it's commented below, for testing purposes). > > In the hopes that we can start a, hopefully, small thread around the subject, > I'm sending this HACK which I used to get TWD and global timer enabled so I > could measure latencies with cyclictest. > > Is it so that TWD shouldn't be available on UP integrations of ARM's Cortex-A > processors ? > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c > @@ -388,8 +389,10 @@ static void __init twd_local_timer_of_register(struct device_node *np) > { > int err; > > +#if 0 > if (!is_smp() || !setup_max_cpus) > return; > +#endif > > twd_ppi = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, 0); > if (!twd_ppi) { Why don't you just check for the c-a9 revision here? If it's the UP processor then allow twd? Similar to what's done in global_timer_of_register? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html