On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 09:09:26AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [150526 07:14]:
> > On 05/20/2015 04:07 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > The currently in-use port->startup and port->shutdown are "okay". The
> > > startup part for instance does the tiny omap extra part and invokes
> > > serial8250_do_startup() for the remaining pieces. The workflow in
> > > serial8250_do_startup() is okay except for the part where UART_RX is
> > > read without a check if there is something to read. I tried to
> > > workaround it in commit 0aa525d11859 ("tty: serial: 8250_core: read only
> > > RX if there is something in the FIFO") but then reverted it later in
> > > commit ca8bb4aefb9 ("serial: 8250: Revert "tty: serial: 8250_core: read
> > > only RX if there is something in the FIFO"").
> > >
> > > This is the second attempt to get it to work on older OMAPs without
> > > breaking other chips this time
> > > Peter Hurley suggested to pull in the few needed lines from
> > > serial8250_do_startup() and drop everything else that is not required
> > > including making it simpler like using just request_irq() instead the
> > > chain handler like it is doing now.
> > > So lets try that.
> >
> > Thanks, Sebastian.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can we please get this into the v4.1-rc series?
>
> It fixes the following:
>
> Unhandled fault: external abort on non-linefetch (0x1028) at 0xfa06a000
> ...
> [<c04217e8>] (mem_serial_in) from [<c0425480>] (serial8250_do_startup+0xe4/0x694)
> [<c0425480>] (serial8250_do_startup) from [<c0427e48>] (omap_8250_startup+0x70/0x144)
> [<c0427e48>] (omap_8250_startup) from [<c0425a54>] (serial8250_startup+0x24/0x30)
> [<c0425a54>] (serial8250_startup) from [<c04208e4>] (uart_startup.part.14+0x8c/0x1a0)
> [<c04208e4>] (uart_startup.part.14) from [<c0420fec>] (uart_open+0xd8/0x134)
> [<c0420fec>] (uart_open) from [<c0403e50>] (tty_open+0xdc/0x5e0)
> [<c0403e50>] (tty_open) from [<c018f008>] (chrdev_open+0xac/0x188)
This is a "big" patch to come so late in the -rc cycle. It's been
broken since 4.0, so it can't be _that_ important of a thing if no one
has been screaming about it :)
Are you willing to justify this to Linus as to why it should go in now?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
