Hi Suman, On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/09/2015 02:39 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:37 PM, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> This patch uses the code removed by commit 40e575b1d0b3 ("remoteproc: > >> remove the get_by_name/put API") for the ref counting a rproc klist > >> code but has rproc_get_by_name replaced with an rproc_get_by_phandle API. > > > > The general idea makes sense to me, but I'm not sure we really do need > > a klist here, since the usage profile of this list is expected to be > > super simple: very small number of accessors, looking for small number > > of list members a small number of times, and probably never do need to > > modify the list while accessing it. > > > > I suspect that the code would be simpler to maintain, debug and > > understand if we just use a simple list with a simple locking > > methodology here. > > The klist usage is something that we restored from previous remoteproc > core code as used by the rproc_get_by_name() API. This was removed in > commit 40e575b1d0b3 ("remoteproc: remove the get_by_name/put API"). We > chose to use the code that had been present before rather than inventing > something new all over again. If you feel that a regular list is the way > to go forward, we can make the switch. Yes, please. Using a regular list with a simple locking methodology should make the code easier to understand and debug. Thanks, Ohad. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html