Hi,
has commit 3b72c2fe0c6bbec42e ("drivers: net:ethernet: cpsw: add
support for VLAN") introduced a bug by defining CPSW_VLAN_AWARE as
BIT(1) instead of BIT(2)?
+#define CPSW_VLAN_AWARE BIT(1)
<snip>
/* switch to vlan unaware mode */
- cpsw_ale_control_set(priv->ale, 0, ALE_VLAN_AWARE, 0);
+ cpsw_ale_control_set(priv->ale, priv->host_port, ALE_VLAN_AWARE,
+ CPSW_ALE_VLAN_AWARE);
+ control_reg = readl(&priv->regs->control);
+ control_reg |= CPSW_VLAN_AWARE;
+ writel(control_reg, &priv->regs->control);
See TRM [1] page 1980 (14.5.1.2 CONTROL Register), there bit
CPSW_VLAN_AWARE is number 2.
I didn't do any tests, just stumbled upon.
[1]: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruh73l/spruh73l.pdf
Thanks
-- Christoph
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
