On 04/04/15 05:43, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> clk_add_alias() is provided by clkdev, and is not part of the clk API. >> Howver, it is prototyped in two locations: linux/clkdev.h and >> linux/clk.h. This is a mess. Get rid of the redundant and unnecessary >> version in linux/clk.h. >> >> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Tested-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> > > Actually, this serie fixes a regression I've seen in linux-next, and which was > triggering the Oops in [1] on lubbock. With your serie, the kernel boots fine. > > Is this with the lubbock_defconfig? Is it a regression in 4.0-rc series or is it due to some pending -next patches interacting with the per-user clock patches? It looks like the latter because __clk_get_hw() should be inlined on lubbock_defconfig where CONFIG_COMMON_CLK=n. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
