On Tuesday 10 March 2009, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> @@ -61,6 +65,7 @@ static struct twl_mmc_controller {
> struct omap_mmc_platform_data *mmc;
> u8 twl_vmmc_dev_grp;
> u8 twl_mmc_dedicated;
> + bool vsim_18v;
> char name[HSMMC_NAME_LEN + 1];
> } hsmmc[OMAP34XX_NR_MMC] = {
> {
I have an alternate approach to your patches #2, and #6 ...
basically, as part of switching the mmc-twl4030 glue over to
the regulator framework, each MMC device can have two named
supplies. (And the glue should work with PMICs other than
just the twl4030 family chips.)
So an eMMC chip with both power rails switchable would set up
one for Vcc, and a second for VccQ ... which need not be VSIM,
and need not even use a twl4030. MMC2 and MMC3 would be able
to switch VccQ on after Vcc, for eMMC ... or similarly for an
SDIO chip with a switchable regulator.
So your #2 patch won't be needed, since the second supply would
be handled in a more general way; ditto #6. Some of the other
patches will also be affected.
I'll send patches implementing this as soon as I get them
working on one more board.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
