Hi! > Maybe an option would be to provide two cpu_v7_switch_mm > implementations (one with the errata and one without). Then > the system can start with the simple implementation. Once > the boot as progressed far enough to know, that the hardware > is affected by the errata, it could switch to the implementation > with the flushing. Actually... we should start with the slow&safe option, and then switch to faster implementation if workaround is not needed. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
