Hi! > Hi Pawel, I'm still Pavel. v, not w. > > > Hi Pawel, > > > A corresponding change to the N900 dts would be very nice. > > > > Corresponding change to the dts will come in separate patch. Or do you > > have n900 for testing? > > Yes, it should be a separate patch, I agree. > > I do have one but I can't say when I'd have time to test it. I'm fine with > you having tested it though. > > > > I think you're missing change to adp1653_i2c_driver.driver.of_match_table. > > > > It actually worked for me, which means device tree somehow does it > > magic. > > By magic? :-) It probably just ends up comparing the device and the driver > names. How about adding the of_match_table? I guess it uses adp1653_id_table. I'd hade to add redundand information, because if it would just mask the errors if the code changed... Thanks, Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
