On 03/26/2015 07:30 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [150326 03:55]:
On 03/26/2015 09:24 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 03/26/2015 01:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [150325 08:12]:
Splits the clock provider init out of the PRM driver and moves it to
clock driver. This is needed so that once the PRCM drivers are
separated,
they can logically just access the clock driver not needing to go
through
common PRM code. This would be wrong in the case of control module for
example.
...
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c
...
-u32 omap2_clk_readl(struct clk_hw_omap *clk, void __iomem *reg)
+u32 omap2_clk_memmap_readl(void __iomem *reg)
{
- u32 val;
+ struct clk_omap_reg *r = (struct clk_omap_reg *)®
- if (clk->flags & MEMMAP_ADDRESSING) {
- struct clk_omap_reg *r = (struct clk_omap_reg *)®
- val = readl_relaxed(clk_memmaps[r->index] + r->offset);
- } else {
- val = readl_relaxed(reg);
- }
+ return readl_relaxed(clk_memmaps[r->index] + r->offset);
+}
The cast from void __iomem *reg to struct clk_omap_reg *r looks still
nasty.. Why don't you add the IO address into struct clk_omap_reg:
struct clk_omap_reg {
u16 offset;
u16 index;
struct regmap *regmap;
void __iomem *addr;
};
...
Then populate it during init and then have the clock code use it
directly if available? Then it seems you would not need the
static struct clk_iomap *clk_memmaps[CLK_MAX_MEMMAPS] at all?
Doing a change like this should probably be planned, but it is a larger
modification. Currently none of the low-level clock APIs support this,
but instead expect a direct iomem pointer against which they can do
arithmetic operations. The major problem is the companion clocks, which
just XOR some bits in the registers to get ICLK / IDLEST register offset
>from FCLK.
So, for now, clock code just uses the void __iomem pointer as a storage
class for struct clk_omap_reg, on which arithmetic operations can be done.
Well how about keep the check if (clk->flags & MEMMAP_ADDRESSING) at
least? Maybe WARN_ON(!(clk->flags & MEMMAP_ADDRESSING))?
Otherwise this could be a nightmare to debug if anything goes wrong.
Yea, adding a warning is a good idea for now, I'll do this update
tomorrow morning.
-Tero
I did this change as a trial, and this is the diff required to get it
working:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clkt_iclk.c | 20 ++++++++---------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c | 47
+++++++++++++++++----------------------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.h | 8 +++----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2430.c | 5 +++--
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock34xx.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----------------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3517.c | 20 ++++++++---------
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm.h | 4 +++-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm2xxx.c | 9 +++-----
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm3xxx.c | 10 +++------
drivers/clk/ti/clk.c | 10 +++++----
drivers/clk/ti/divider.c | 24 ++++++++++++++------
drivers/clk/ti/dpll.c | 11 ++++-----
drivers/clk/ti/gate.c | 21 +++++++++++------
drivers/clk/ti/interface.c | 9 ++++----
drivers/clk/ti/mux.c | 22 ++++++++++++------
include/linux/clk/ti.h | 5 +++--
16 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
I think we should probably keep this out of this set now and do this while
moving the OMAP core clock support code under clock driver... just to keep
it more easily manageable.
OK fine with me to do that as a follow-up patch.
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
