On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 06:26:17PM +0100, Fabian Frederick wrote: > > On 17 March 2015 at 18:19 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well, another thing to do if there's no dependencies is to just send > > each patch separately - there's no real relationship between the > > patches. This also avoids the issue. > Such trivial updates are generally applied by David or Greg > after receiving some ack. That's the reason for the patchset :) It's pretty disappointing if that's the case, though it might be something connected with the submission style - for most of the kernel patches would normally be handled directly by the maintainer.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
