Re: Problems while designing TPS65023 regulator driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 06 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Later, I found out that in set_machine_constraints(),ops->enable() is
> > being called if the boot_on flag is set. What is the purpose of doing
> > this? Since the regulator is already enabled, why we are calling the
> > ops->enable() to do the same again? In my opinion, regulator_enable()
> 
> This ensures that the regulator is actually turned on.  Previously
> boot_on was equivalent to always_on and there was no way for a machine
> driver to turn a regulator on at startup so the semantics of boot_on
> were changed slightly to be usable to switch a regulator on at boot.

The boot_on semantics are kind of odd then ...

What I thought they meant:  Bootloader turned this on.
What you describe above:    Kernel turn this on during startup.
Versus normal behavior:     Consumer turns it on, as needed.

I wouldn't have thought there would be a need for that
second case, since the board-specific init code can
just define a consumer that turns it on if that's what
it needs.

- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux