On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:47:48PM +0200, Grygorii.Strashko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On 03/05/2015 10:17 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 08:55:07PM +0200, Grygorii.Strashko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> The dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent() will fail in case 'Example 3' and succeed in cases 1,2.
> >> dma-mapping.c --> __dma_supported()
> >> if (sizeof(mask) != sizeof(dma_addr_t) && <== true for all OMAP4+
> >> mask > (dma_addr_t)~0 && <== true for DMA_BIT_MASK(64)
> >> dma_to_pfn(dev, ~0) < max_pfn) { <== true only for Example 3
> >
> > Hmm, I think this may make more sense to be "< max_pfn - 1" here, as
> > that would be better suited to our intention.
> >
> > The result of dma_to_pfn(dev, ~0) is the maximum PFN which we could
> > address via DMA, but we're comparing it with the maximum PFN in the
> > system plus 1 - so we need to subtract one from it.
>
> Ok. I'll try it.
Any news on this - I think it is a real off-by-one bug which we should
fix in any case.
Thanks.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
