Hi Kim > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of DongSoo(Nathaniel) Kim > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:58 PM > To: Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto > Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Sakari Ailus; > Tuukka.O Toivonen; Hiroshi DOYU; MiaoStanley; Nagalla, Hari; Hiremath, > Vaibhav; Lakhani, Amish; Menon, Nishanth > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] OMAP3430SDP: Add support for Camera Kit v3 > > Hi Sergio, > > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:44 AM, Aguirre Rodriguez, Sergio Alberto > <saaguirre@xxxxxx> wrote: > > + /* turn on analog power */ > > + twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, > > + VAUX_2_8_V, TWL4030_VAUX2_DEDICATED); > > + twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER, > > + VAUX_DEV_GRP_P1, TWL4030_VAUX2_DEV_GRP); > > + > > + /* out of standby */ > > + gpio_set_value(MT9P012_STANDBY_GPIO, 0); > > + udelay(1000); > > It seems better using msleep rather than udelay for 1000us much. Just > to be safe :) > How about you? > Why is msleep safer than udelay ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html