On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Kanigeri, Hari <h-kanigeri2@xxxxxx> wrote: > Nishant, > >> Yeah it gets real confusing. How about following the same >> rules for the OMAPZOOM kernel here too: any patch w.r.t >> OMAPZOOM comes: >> Subj: RE: [OMAPZOOM PATCH 0/5] DSPBRIDGE: blah blah blah. >> > > -- I agree with your suggestion. The subject should have OMAPZOOM to differentiate. Nishanth has kindly explained me that this patch, sent to the l-o mailing list, is not meant for the l-o tree. A better way to differentiate patches specific for o-z is to send them to the o-z mailing list, instead of l-o, right? Tony: Or have you agreed with TI that these [OMAPZOOM] patches that don't apply on top of l-o are ok here? -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
