On Wed 2015-03-04 21:36:50, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:24:19PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > @@ -1239,8 +1234,8 @@ static long cs_char_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> >
> > if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &ifver, sizeof(ifver)))
> > r = -EFAULT;
> > - break;
> > }
> > + break;
> > case CS_CONFIG_BUFS: {
> > struct cs_buffer_config buf_cfg;
> >
> > @@ -1249,8 +1244,8 @@ static long cs_char_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> > r = -EFAULT;
> > else
> > r = cs_hsi_buf_config(csdata->hi, &buf_cfg);
> > - break;
> > }
> > + break;
>
> I think having the break inside the block is more readable.
> Now the indendation is mess.
Half the function does it one way, one the other way. I don't care
which way, but it should be consistent.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
