From: Eero Nurkkala <ext-eero.nurkkala@xxxxxxxxx>
It is the bit 8 that is for FCLK. All other blocks in
OMAPs use the bit 8 for denying FCLK idling.
This is an RFC, I'd like some discussion. Somebody
double-check this?
Signed-off-by: Eero Nurkkala <ext-eero.nurkkala@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
index 0258b55..11057eb 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
#define SYSC_AUTOIDLE_MASK (1 << 0)
#define SYSC_IDLEMODE_SMART 0x2
-#define SYSC_CLOCKACTIVITY_FCLK 0x2
+#define SYSC_CLOCKACTIVITY_FCLK 0x1
struct omap_i2c_dev {
--
1.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
