Ohad, On 02/12/2015 11:20 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote: >> My original motivation was that it would only need to be added on >> firmwares requiring support for loading into internal memories, >> otherwise, these are something left to be managed by the software >> running on the remote processor completely, and MPU will not even touch >> them. > > Sure. But even if you guys will use this interface correctly, this > patch essentially exposes ioremap to user space, which is something we > generally want to avoid. > >> So, let me know if this is a NAK. If so, we have two options - one to go >> the sram node model where each of them have to be defined separately, >> and have a specific property in the rproc nodes to be able to get the >> gen_pool handles. The other one is simply to define these as <reg> and >> use devm_ioremap_resource() (so use DT for defining the regions instead >> of a resource table entry). > > Any approach where these regions are defined explicitly really sounds > better. If you could look into these two alternatives that would be > great. OK, will do. Meanwhile, can you pick up Patch 1, that is independent of this patch. regards Suman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
