Hi! > > > $ du -b arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb > > > 70212 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n900.dtb > > > > > > $ echo $((0x10000)) > > > 65536 > > > > > > I would say, problem is because omap3-n900 binary DT is too large > > I agree. > > > OK if that's the case, then your patch makes sense to me. It also > > seems we can have the temporary stack be larger than the initial > > stack just for atags_to_fdt. > > The stack size isn't the issue, but rather its location. We need to > position it away from the DT data. The DT size is known and we could > use that, plus some room for the insertion of new data coming from the > ATAG conversion. > > Something like the following would be a more robust solution: > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S > index 68be901759..89718de9dd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.S > @@ -263,16 +263,37 @@ restart: adr r0, LC0 > * OK... Let's do some funky business here. > * If we do have a DTB appended to zImage, and we do have > * an ATAG list around, we want the later to be translated > - * and folded into the former here. To be on the safe side, > - * let's temporarily move the stack away into the malloc > - * area. No GOT fixup has occurred yet, but none of the > - * code we're about to call uses any global variable. > + * and folded into the former here. No GOT fixup has occurred > + * yet, but none of the code we're about to call uses any > + * global variable. > */ > - add sp, sp, #0x10000 > + > + /* Get the initial DTB size */ > + ldr r5, [r6, #4] > +#ifndef __ARMEB__ > + /* convert to little endian */ > + eor r1, r5, r5, ror #16 > + bic r1, r1, #0x00ff0000 > + mov r5, r5, ror #8 > + eor r5, r5, r1, lsr #8 > +#endif > + /* 50% DTB growth should be good enough */ > + add r5, r5, r5, lsr #1 > + /* preserve 64-bit alignment */ > + add r5, r5, #7 > + bic r5, r5, #7 > + /* clamp to 32KB min and 1MB max */ > + movs r1, r5, lsr #15 > + moveq r5, #(1 << 15) > + movs r1, r5, lsr #20 > + movne r5, #(1 << 20) Dunno. Would it be easier/simpler to just use 1MB, always? Do we support machines with <16MB RAM? Best regards, -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html