On 20 January 2015 at 01:00, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 01/19, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> Adds a way for clock consumers to set maximum and minimum rates. This can be
>> used for thermal drivers to set ceiling rates, or by misc. drivers to set
>> floor rates to assure a minimum performance level.
>>
>> Changes the signature of the determine_rate callback by adding the
>> parameters floor_rate and ceiling_rate.
>
> Commit text needs the s/floor/min and s/ceiling/max treatment
> too.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> index f2a1ff3..55b3124 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
>> @@ -1026,6 +1051,28 @@ static unsigned long clk_core_round_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *clk,
>> else
>> return clk->rate;
>> }
>> +unsigned long __clk_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>> + unsigned long rate,
>> + unsigned long min_rate,
>> + unsigned long max_rate)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long parent_rate = 0;
>> + struct clk_core *core = hw->core;
>> + struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
>> +
>> + if (!core->ops->determine_rate)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (core->parent) {
>> + parent_rate = core->parent->rate;
>> + parent_hw = core->parent->hw;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return core->ops->determine_rate(core->hw, rate,
>> + min_rate, max_rate,
>> + &parent_rate, &parent_hw);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clk_determine_rate);
>
> Maybe I misled you with the API name. I was thinking more along
> the lines of clk_round_rate() and this new function ending up
> calling clk_core_round_rate(), but clk_round_rate() would call it
> with whatever range the clock is constrained to while this new
> function would allow driver authors to specify the range. It
> should be easy enough to add min/max to clk_core_round_rate()
> given that it's a private API in this file.
Yeah, I wasn't sure whether it made sense for __clk_determine_rate to
have the fallbacks because any caller would need to have checked that
the clock implementation supports determine_rate and is aware of the
rate constraints.
As long as people don't get confused, I'm fine with any of the possibilities.
Regards,
Tomeu
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
