On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:19:16PM +0530, Mugunthan V N wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 10:28 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > CPSW never uses RX_THRESHOLD or MISC interrupts. In > > fact, they are always kept masked in their appropriate > > IRQ Enable register. > > > > Instead of allocating an IRQ that never fires, it's best > > to remove that code altogether and let future patches > > implement it if anybody needs those. > > > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> > > Instead of introducing dummy ISR in previous patch and then removing in > this patch, both can be squashed into a single patch. sure they can. I decided to split to ease review and to make sure only one thing happens in a single patch. -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
