On Tuesday 13 January 2015 21:42:20 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> [150113 12:27]: > > On Tuesday 13 January 2015 09:57:41 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > It seems we can now drop omap3517 legacy booting support > > > to get a bit closer to making all of omap3 boot in device > > > tree only mode. > > > > > > All these boards have at least minimal support for booting > > > with device tree, and pretty much anything supported with > > > the legacy board files can be configured also for device > > > tree based booting if not done already. > > > > Ah, very nice. > > > > Just out of curiosity, what are the remaining showstoppers > > for the 3430 and 3530 based boards? > > Not much really. We're now printing a warning to get a people > to upgrade their systems. So with some boards we need to wait > a while. > > Then here are the remaining items that I'm aware of: > > - A regression at least on some n900 with appended DTB not > booting properly any longer reported by Pali > > - A regression where the legacy ATAGs don't seem to get > properly translated by the uncompress code for atag_rev at > least reported by Pali > > - A few missing .dts files for devkit8000, omap3logic, > omap3stalker, omap3pandora and omap3touchbook > > Pali and Sebastian probably know best of any other remaining > issues to drop n900 legacy booting. > > If people have the boards listed above, please pitch in to do > the .dts files or send the boards to me and I can do minimal > .dts files for them. > > Regards, > > Tony CCing Pavel Machek He reported also some (still not fixed) regressions on n900. -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
