Nothing to do with this patch in particular, but...
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 04:01:15PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> @@ -102,8 +105,8 @@ static struct resource sdp2430_smc91x_resources[] = {
> .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> },
> [1] = {
> - .start = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OMAP24XX_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ),
> - .end = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(OMAP24XX_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ),
> + .start = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(SDP2430_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ),
> + .end = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(SDP2430_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ),
> .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ | IORESOURCE_IRQ_LOWLEVEL,
normally we only pass start and this should probably be using
gpio_to_irq(), but for that...
> },
> };
> @@ -170,13 +173,13 @@ static inline void __init sdp2430_init_smc91x(void)
> sdp2430_smc91x_resources[0].end = cs_mem_base + 0x30f;
> udelay(100);
>
> - if (gpio_request(OMAP24XX_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ, "SMC91x irq") < 0) {
> + if (gpio_request(SDP2430_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ, "SMC91x irq") < 0) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to request GPIO%d for smc91x IRQ\n",
> - OMAP24XX_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ);
> + SDP2430_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ);
> gpmc_cs_free(eth_cs);
> goto out;
> }
> - gpio_direction_input(OMAP24XX_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ);
> + gpio_direction_input(SDP2430_ETHR_GPIO_IRQ);
we should probably add:
sdp2430_scm91x_resources[1].start = gpio_to_irq(OMAP24XX_ETHER_GPIO_IRQ);
here
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
