On Sun, 2009-02-08 at 10:37 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > From: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips. > In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are > used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only > used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given > voltage rail is not needed. > > The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various > regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows > that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails. > > The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control, > such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown, > and suspend states. Unless/until software hooks are known to > be safe, they won't be exported here. > > These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but > can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is > effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware > inputs not exposed. > > Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Applied. Thanks Liam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
