On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 11:59:54AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 05:56:45PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > > Register with kernel power-off handler instead of setting pm_power_off > > > directly. Register with low priority to reflect that the original code > > > only sets pm_power_off if it was not already set. > > > > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v3: > > > - Replace poweroff in all newly introduced variables and in text > > > with power_off or power-off as appropriate > > > - Replace POWEROFF_PRIORITY_xxx with POWER_OFF_PRIORITY_xxx > > > v2: > > > - Use define to specify poweroff handler priority > > > - Use devm_register_power_off_handler > > > - Use dev_warn instead of dev_err > > > > > > drivers/mfd/palmas.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++-------------- > > > include/linux/mfd/palmas.h | 3 +++ > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> > > missed lakml and linux-omap. > Felipe, unfortunately, get_maintainer.pl doesn't give a hint that this and the other affected patches should be sent to linux-omap. How am I supposed to know ? Note that linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx was copied on the entire series, if that is what you mean with lakml. linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx was also copied on all patches. Additional mailing lists were only copied for affected architectures to avoid for the patches to be tagged as spam. If there is a list named lakml, I must have missed it, and I seem to be unable to find a reference to it. If that is the case, my apologies, and please provide a link to it. Thanks, Guenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
