On 12:52-20141031, Roger Quadros wrote: > For PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP and PIN_OUTPUT_PULLDOWN we must not set the > PULL_DIS bit which disables the PULLs. > > While at that get rid for the PULL_ENA defination. It is misleading > as there is no PULL enable bit in the register. And a zero bit defination > makes no sense. It was done to make it readable. Pull is enabled when that bit is 0 and disabled when that bit is 1. it is counter intutive enough for a macro to be defined. I suggest retaining that and not mixing with the current patch. > > Fixes: 23d9cec07c58 (:pinctrl: dra: dt-bindings: Fix pull enable/disable") s/:pinctrl/"pinctrl/ ? > > Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> > --- > include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/dra.h | 9 ++++----- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/dra.h b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/dra.h > index 3d33794..71098e4 100644 > --- a/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/dra.h > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/pinctrl/dra.h > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ > #define MUX_MODE14 0xe > #define MUX_MODE15 0xf > > -#define PULL_ENA (0 << 16) > #define PULL_DIS (1 << 16) > #define PULL_UP (1 << 17) > #define INPUT_EN (1 << 18) > @@ -40,12 +39,12 @@ > > /* Active pin states */ > #define PIN_OUTPUT (0 | PULL_DIS) > -#define PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP (PIN_OUTPUT | PULL_ENA | PULL_UP) > -#define PIN_OUTPUT_PULLDOWN (PIN_OUTPUT | PULL_ENA) > +#define PIN_OUTPUT_PULLUP (PULL_UP) > +#define PIN_OUTPUT_PULLDOWN (0) > #define PIN_INPUT (INPUT_EN | PULL_DIS) > #define PIN_INPUT_SLEW (INPUT_EN | SLEWCONTROL) > -#define PIN_INPUT_PULLUP (PULL_ENA | INPUT_EN | PULL_UP) > -#define PIN_INPUT_PULLDOWN (PULL_ENA | INPUT_EN) > +#define PIN_INPUT_PULLUP (INPUT_EN | PULL_UP) > +#define PIN_INPUT_PULLDOWN (INPUT_EN) > > #endif > > -- > 1.8.3.2 > -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
