On 10/28/2014 05:57 AM, Frans Klaver wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:27:45PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> >> On 10/27/2014 10:56 AM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> >>> Alternatively we could fix either elm_config() or omap_nand_probe() to >>> return -EPROBE_DEFER in case the device is present but driver not yet probed. >>> >> >> Yes, that's a good idea. Can't we do both? Getting a systematic deferred >> probe sounds like a bit silly to me. > > It may be. If we do both and something moves again, or something is > added that depends on omap_elm but is probed earlier, you won't be > noticing the new systematic probe deferral until you really start > looking at it. > That's correct. Relying on the link order is very fragile. > There isn't a real dependency system in the drivers, is there? > Nope. -- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
