On 09/09/2014 05:34 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 09/09/2014 04:31 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> Pass the correct 'mask' and 'value' bits to c_can_hw_raminit_wait_ti(). >> They seem to have been swapped in the usage instances. > > Can you split this fix into a seperate patch, please. OK. > >> TI's RAMINIT DONE mechanism is buggy and may not always be >> set after the START bit is set. So add a timeout mechanism to >> c_can_hw_raminit_wait_ti(). > > What should happen if the timeout occurs? I'm not sure yet. I will verify if the hardware still works or not in that case. If it doesn't work then we should fail. cheers, -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
