* Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [140905 14:16]:
> On 14:45-20140827, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 08/27/2014 02:43 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 27 August 2014 03:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >> * Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> [140827 12:05]:
> > >>> On 08/27/2014 01:58 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > >>>> Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> writes:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On OMAP5 / DRA7, prevent a CPU powerdomain OFF and resulting MPU OSWR
> > >>>>> and instead attempt a CPU RET and side effect, MPU RET in suspend.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
> > >>>>> [nm@xxxxxx: update to do save_state only on DRA7]
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
> > >>>>> ---
> > >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c | 4 ++++
> > >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c | 2 +-
> > >>>>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 9 +++++++--
> > >>>>> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c
> > >>>>> index 207fce2..0d640eb 100644
> > >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c
> > >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-mpuss-lowpower.c
> > >>>>> @@ -242,6 +242,10 @@ int omap4_enter_lowpower(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int power_state)
> > >>>>> save_state = 1;
> > >>>>> break;
> > >>>>> case PWRDM_POWER_RET:
> > >>>>> + if (soc_is_omap54xx() || soc_is_dra7xx()) {
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Aren't we trying to get away from these soc_* checks for anything other
> > >>>> than init code?
> > >>>
> > >>> I would expect that to take place in stages as part of which the next
> > >>> level of cleanup is to move PRM into drivers. Currently our wakeupgen,
> > >>> prm code does have quiet a few needs of dealing with soc_is checks
> > >>> primarily from having to re-architect code in two different directions
> > >>> - we want to move into just one direction eventually - to prm drivers
> > >>> and as less code in mach-omap2 which is already in the works.
> > >>
> > >> Why don't you just set some flag at init time based on the
> > >> soc_is check and then test that here? That limits the use of
> > >> soc_is to init code only which makes it easier to phase it
> > >> out completely eventually.
> > >>
> > > Indeed. Infact the version of the code I tried posting last year was
> > > using a flag which was initialised during init. Same can be
> > > done her.
> >
> > OK. will try something along that line in the next rev.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Updated patch below:
Looks OK to me thanks.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
