On 07/03/2014 11:34 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 02:25 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Without the patch:
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck # cat clk_rate
532000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div # cat clk_rate
532000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div/l4_root_clk_div # cat clk_rate
532000000
With the patch:
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck # cat clk_rate
532000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div # cat clk_rate
266000000
/debug/.../dpll_core_x2_ck/dpll_core_h12x2_ck/l3_iclk_div/l4_root_clk_div # cat clk_rate
133000000
The l3 clock derived from core DPLL is actually a divider clock,
with the default divider set to 2. l4 then derived from l3 is a fixed factor
clock, but the fixed divider is 2 and not 1. Which means the l3 clock is
half of core DPLLs h12x2 and l4 is half of l3 (as seen with this patch)
Tero, this seems like is yet to be picked up. You see any issues with this that needs to be
addressed?
Yea this actually looks good to me. Queued for 3.16-rc dt-clk fixes.
-Tero
regards,
Rajendra
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
index cfb8fc7..a14c99b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7xx-clocks.dtsi
@@ -673,10 +673,12 @@
l3_iclk_div: l3_iclk_div {
#clock-cells = <0>;
- compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
+ compatible = "ti,divider-clock";
+ ti,max-div = <2>;
+ ti,bit-shift = <4>;
+ reg = <0x0100>;
clocks = <&dpll_core_h12x2_ck>;
- clock-mult = <1>;
- clock-div = <1>;
+ ti,index-power-of-two;
};
l4_root_clk_div: l4_root_clk_div {
@@ -684,7 +686,7 @@
compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
clocks = <&l3_iclk_div>;
clock-mult = <1>;
- clock-div = <1>;
+ clock-div = <2>;
};
video1_clk2_div: video1_clk2_div {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html