Hi Suman,
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:34 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> wrote:
> static int omap_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct hwspinlock_pdata *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> + struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> struct hwspinlock_device *bank;
> struct hwspinlock *hwlock;
> struct resource *res;
> void __iomem *io_base;
> int num_locks, i, ret;
> + int base_id = 0;
We shouldn't implicitly assume base_id is zero: let's explicitly
protect against potential subsequent invocations of
omap_hwspinlock_probe.
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
