Re: [PATCH 1/1] MMC/SD hot plug fix for TWL based boards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 09 February 2009, Manikandan Pillai wrote:
> MMC hotplug was not functioning properly since the SYS_nIRQ
> MUX was setup as GPIO by default in the u-boot and was not
> being set properly in the Linux kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai <mani.pillai@xxxxxx>

Hmm, most of this looks like the patch I sent last week,
instead of work that you did.

Normal practice is to post a patch on top of what I sent
in such cases...


> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c    |    2 --
>  drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c        |    5 ++++-
>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> index 6386c25..6e9a399 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap3evm.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
>  #include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/leds.h>
>  
>  #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
>  #include <linux/spi/ads7846.h>
> @@ -50,6 +51,11 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE)
> +static int omap3evm_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
> +		unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio);
> +#endif


Must you have the #ifdef there?  There doesn't
seem to be a reason not to set up that IRQ in
its dedicated IRQ role in all cases.


> +
>  static struct resource omap3evm_smc911x_resources[] = {
>  	[0] =	{
>  		.start  = OMAP3EVM_ETHR_START,
> @@ -102,6 +108,9 @@ static struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data omap3evm_gpio_data = {
>  	.gpio_base	= OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES,
>  	.irq_base	= TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_BASE,
>  	.irq_end	= TWL4030_GPIO_IRQ_END,
> +	.pulldowns	= BIT(2) | BIT(6) | BIT(8) | BIT(13)
> +				| BIT(16) | BIT(17),
> +	.setup		= omap3evm_twl_gpio_setup,
>  };
>  
>  static struct twl4030_usb_data omap3evm_usb_data = {
> @@ -463,6 +472,27 @@ static void omap_init_pr785(void)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE)
> +static int omap3evm_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
> +		unsigned gpio, unsigned ngpio)
> +{
> +	/* gpio + 0 is "mmc0_cd" (input/IRQ) */
> +	mmc[0].gpio_cd = gpio + 0;
> +	twl4030_mmc_init(mmc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void omap_init_twl4030(void)
> +{
> +	if (cpu_is_omap343x()) {
> +		omap_cfg_reg(AF26_34XX_GPIO0);
> +		omap_cfg_reg(L8_34XX_GPIO63);
> +	}
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +
>  static void __init omap3_evm_init(void)
>  {
>  	omap3_evm_i2c_init();
> @@ -476,7 +506,7 @@ static void __init omap3_evm_init(void)
>  
>  	omap_serial_init();
>  #if defined(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE)
> -	twl4030_mmc_init(mmc);
> +	omap_init_twl4030();
>  #endif

Just stick the omap_cfg_reg() calls there; no need to
create subroutine indirection.


>  #if defined(CONFIG_OMAP3EVM_PR785)
>  	omap_init_pr785();
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c
> index 88ae1bf..00a200f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mmc-twl4030.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,6 @@ int twl_mmc_set_voltage(struct hsmmc_controller *c, int vdd)
>  	else
>  		dev_grp_val = LDO_CLR;		/* Power down */
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_TWL4030_CORE)
>  	ret = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
>  					dev_grp_val, c->hsmmc_dev_grp);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -133,7 +132,6 @@ int twl_mmc_set_voltage(struct hsmmc_controller *c, int vdd)
>  
>  	ret = twl4030_i2c_write_u8(TWL4030_MODULE_PM_RECEIVER,
>  					vmmc, c->hsmmc_dedicated);
> -#endif

If those #ifdefs are an issue, why only for EVM?  Other TWL
based boards haven't needed it ...

>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> index db37490..2f16072 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c
> @@ -518,6 +518,9 @@ static void mmc_omap_detect(struct work_struct *work)
>  	struct mmc_omap_host *host = container_of(work, struct mmc_omap_host,
>  						mmc_carddetect_work);
>  
> +	struct omap_mmc_slot_data *slot = &mmc_slot(host);
> +	host->carddetect = slot->card_detect(slot->card_detect_irq);
> +

This should not be needed ... why wasn't it done a long time back?


>  	sysfs_notify(&host->mmc->class_dev.kobj, NULL, "cover_switch");
>  	if (host->carddetect) {
>  		mmc_detect_change(host->mmc, (HZ * 200) / 1000);
> @@ -947,7 +950,7 @@ static int __init omap_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		goto err1;
>  	}
>  
> -	host->dbclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mmchsdb_fck");
> +	host->dbclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "mmchs_fck");

This is odd.  If it's needed, why don't other OMAP3 boards need it too?


>  	/*
>  	 * MMC can still work without debounce clock.
>  	 */
> -- 
> 1.5.6
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux